click for image information

Addiction Studies Program for Journalists
June 11-12, 2010 Workshop
Scottsdale, Arizona

The June 2010 workshop of the Addiction Studies Program for Journalists was sponsored by Wake Forest University School of Medicine and National Families in Action. Print, broadcast, and electronic journalists from media across the nation attended.




Participants
What Journalists Said
Faculty
Agenda



June 2010 Workshop Participants
     

Tonia Bendickson
Anchor/Reporter
WBTV News
Charlotte, North Carolina

Vicki Brower
Contributing Writer
Journal of the National Cancer
Institute

New York, New York

Jim Burress
Reporter
WABE-FM
Atlanta, Georgia

Jennifer Calhoun
Health Reporter/Staff Writer
The Fayetteville Observer
Fayetteville, North Carolina

Amanda Codispoti
Reporter
The Roanoke Times
Roanoke, Virginia

Cindy Culp
Staff Reporter
Waco Tribune-Herald
Waco, Texas

Bonnie Davis
Media Relations Manager
Office/Public Relations, Marketing
Wake Forest U. Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Gregory Reese
Contributing Writer
Our Weekly
Los Angeles, California

Hayley Ringle
General Assignment Reporter
East Valley Tribune
Mesa, Arizona

Catherine Romano
Executive Editor
US Weekly
New York, New York

Steve Jefferson
Crime Reporter/Anchor
WTHR TV News/Website
Indianapolis, Indiana

Carol Kelly
Graduate Student
UNC-Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Tom Kertscher
Reporter
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Allison Knezevich
Reporter
The Charleston Gazette
Charleston, West Virginia

Nancy Fowler Larson
Freelance Journalist
St. Louis, Missouri

Jeremy Pawloski
Reporter
The Olympian
Olympia, Washington

Tim Pulliam
Reporter
WECT
Wilmington, North Carolina

Joy Slagowski
Reporter
Daily News Sun
Sun City, Arizona

Jeanine Stice, MPH, RD
Free lance writer/
Nutrition Consultant
Salem, Oregon

Kimberly Hayes Taylor
Independent Health Journalist
Detroit, Michigan









What Participants Said about the June 2010 Workshop

Welcome and Introductions
--Appreciated starting off on a casual note. Also appreciated the diversity of journalists in the program.
--Good explanation of program and how it can help reporters. The introductions were a good way to meet the other participants.

History of Drug Abuse and Addiction
--Loved it. Fascinating to see the relationships between alcohol/drugs and historical trends. Interesting—presented materials not common knowledge—culminated in clear historical view of topic.
--Good information, came up with several good story ideas, very informative.

Fundamentals of Drug Action
--Wow—I can’t believe how fascinating this fundamental approach to drug addiction is. It helps to know the chemistry behind it. Great presentation.
--Shelly Schwartz-Bloom is and amazing and talented teachers who easily breaks down complex information.

Neurobiology I
--Especially found the aspect of addiction being genetically based helpful to know, as well as the impact of starting as an adolescent.
--Very compelling info. On progression of addiction, why people use drugs, and how brain reacts to drugs—most compelling. What you do when you’re 13 impacts your grandchildren.

Neurobiology II
--Ditto above. It really made me understand addiction more as a disease. The comparison to congestive heart failure was really helpful and eyeopening.
--Excellent information that can be applied to future research and stories, especially role of genetics and tags.

Does Prevention Work? What the Science Tells Us
--Excellent, lovely discussion on ways to combat abuse on a legal and local level.
--This was really helpful as far as learning how to better evaluate prevention programs in my community. I’m definitely going to apply a more critical eye to the annual PR campaigns we tend to give rah-rah coverage to.

A Personal Story of Addiction
--Mind-blowing, gut-wrenching and brave personal testimony went beyond my expectations. Everyone should hear Susan’s story.
--Is there a rating greater than excellent? Susan would get that X 10. She’s brave, engaging, honest and of course, articulate. Did I mention brave? Wonderful cap-off to put a human face on what we learned that day.

Does Addiction Treatment Work?
--Brilliant!! This will help me so much for almost every story I write. It gave me a fresh new perspective on addiction treatment and completely opened my eyes. I needed this. Every reporter in my newsroom does, in fact.
--Cool presentation. I liked the examples showing how effective treatment is versus no treatment. Also—it made me think about how risk factors for addicts are the same for these as other illnesses.

Targeting Dispositions for Drug Offenders
--Again, 100% fresh perspective. Great way of explaining why an “all or nothing” approach will never work.
--This was by far my favorite session. It was packed with tons of eye-opening information that I think I will be able to use to develop numerous stories. A lot of the things I learned were counterintuitive, which means they will likely also be interesting/ surprising to my readers

College on Problems of Drug Dependence
--Good overview of the CPDD organization and research underway.
--Good to hear his tips about working with scientists. He also presented very good story ideas based on the abstracts.

Scientifically Reliable Internet Sources
--A wonderful collection of sites. I knew about a few but most were new to me. This will really help

 

Scientifically Reliable Internet Sources, cont.
me dig deeper into stories. Data is often the key to giving a story an edge.
--This is a list of priceless resources that would impact almost every story.

Journalists’ Roundtable
--I loved hearing everyone’s ideas. Everyone had different interests and their thoughts added to some of my ideas. It was a good way to sort through story ideas that could have a great impact on society.
--Good to hear what great ideas people will go back and write/produce.

Did the Program Meet Your Overall Expectations?
--Exceeded my expectations of what I learned and story ideas I came up with. Great diversity of speakers who really worked well together.
--I learned things I didn’t know about addiction and had preconceived notions corrected. Also, I now have sources (experts) I can contact when I have questions about addiction. The program was great.

Will the Program Improve Your Reporting on Addiction?
--For the first time, I have some idea of how I might explain the scientific basis for addiction. Also, the experts here have all given me their business cards.
--The speakers gave me so much new information and corrected so many popular myths I thought were true. Now that I have accurate info, my stories will be so much better and more in-depth. It also just helped me develop a ton of story ideas that I otherwise would never have considered.

Do You Intend to Use Program Materials in Next 6 Months?
--Absolutely. I have learned so much and have so many story ideas. I also plan to use the info on the flash drive to hold a brownbag at work for my co-workers.
--Yep. Planning it in my head right now. Can’t wait to tell my editor.

Do You Intend Visit the Program Website in Next 6 Months? What Information Would Be Most Helpful to You?
—The info is priceless and can help me set aside my coverage to stand out from other reporters.
—Statistics about addiction and drug abuse. Also, any new studies that come out that would make a good story.

Did the Program Change Your View of Addiction?
--I never knew there was a difference between addiction and abuse. I also really thought if people had the will, they could stop addiction. I didn’t understand the chemical, biogenetic aspects.
--I’m much more inclined to think of it as a disease, in large part because of the parallel drawn to other diseases that must be managed, like diabetes and also because of Deni’s explanation, that this doesn’t absolve the person of responsibility.

How Would You Rate the Overall Quality of the Program?
--Superlative. Everything was well-planned and well-executed. The group size, topic intensity, time devoted, etc. were all perfect.
--This program is awesome. I want to help expose more journalists to the workshop. It goes beyond just health reporters and easily touches crime, courts, etc.

Has the Program Changed the Way You Will Write about Addiction?
--It means I will no longer shy away from stories because of an addiction component. With a better understanding of the complexities behind addiction, I’ll report more—and better—on the story.
--My stories will be more science-based and more in-depth. The program has also given me the tools I need to develop stories to explore.

Other Comments
--The presenters were superlative. The format built upon the previous presentations.
--I liked the quality and background of the presenters and the type of info presented. I liked the flash drive and binder of info given. I liked how organized and well-run everything was.








June 2010 Workshop Faculty and Staff


Deni Carise, PhD
Chief Clinical Officer
Phoenix House
Senior Scientist
Treatment Research Institute
Adjunct Clinical Professor
University of Pennsylvania
Phoenix House
New York, New York

Harold Holder, PhD
Senior Research Scientist
and Former Director
Prevention Research Center
Berkeley, California

Marc Kaufman, PhD
Associate Professor of Psychiatry
Harvard University
Cambridge, Massachusetts

 

 

Douglas B. Marlowe, JD, PhD
Chief of Science, Law & Policy
National Association of
Drug Court Professionals
Senior Scientist
Treatment Research Institute
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Susan Rook
Recovery Advocate
Carlsbad, New Mexico

Sue Rusche
Co-Director
Addiction Studies Program
President and CEO
National Families in Action

Rochelle “Shelly” Schwartz-Bloom, PhD
Professor of Pharmacology
Duke University Medical Center
Department of Pharmacology
and Cancer Biology
Durham, North Carolina





June 2010 Workshop Agenda


Friday, June 11, 2010

8:00 a.m.
Continental Breakfast

8:30 a.m.
Welcome and Introductions
Sue Rusche

8:45 a.m.
A History of Drug Abuse and
Addiction in the U.S.

Sue Rusche

9:45 a.m.
Fundamentals of Drug Action
Shelly Schwartz-Bloom

11:00 a.m.
Break

11:15 a.m.
The Neurobiology of Addiction I
Shelly Schwartz-Bloom

12:30 p.m.
Lunch

1:30 p.m.
The Neurobiology of Addiction II
Shelly Schwartz-Bloom

2.45 p.m.
Break

3:00 p.m.
Does Prevention Work? What Science Tells Us
Harold Holder

4:30 p.m.
Evaluations

4:45 p.m.
Adjourn

6:00 p.m.
Reception

6:30 p.m.
Dinner
Announcement: 2010 Award Winners
Sue Rusche
A Personal Story of Addiction
Susan Rook

 


Saturday, June 12, 2010

8:30 a.m.
Continental Breakfast

9:00 a.m.
Does Addiction Treatment Work?
Deni Carise

10:30 a.m.
Break

10:45 a.m.
Targeting Dispositions for Drug
Offenders by Risks and Needs

Doug Marlowe

12:15 a.m.
Lunch

1:15 p.m.
An Introduction to the College on
Problems of Drug Dependence (CPDD)

Marc Kaufman

2:45 p.m.
Break

3:00 p.m.
Scientifically Reliable Internet Sources
Sue Rusche

3:30 p.m.
How Can We Use What We Learned Here?
Journalists’ Roundtable

4:45 p.m.
Evaluations

5:00 p.m.
Adjourn

Sunday, June 13, 2010

7:00 a.m.
Meet Your Mentors Breakfast
(For journalists attending the CPDD meeting)
CPDD Scientists
Journalists

 

Home Register Future Workshops Past Workshops Addiction Stories Science Update Links Glossary About

Last Revision
info@addictionstudies.org