|
Sponsored
by Wake Forest University School of Medicine
and National Families in Action |
Addiction
|
Chronic
Abuse of Different Drugs Causes Similar Brain Changes
|
The
results of this study suggest that many drug abusers may experience
similar changes in the patterns of global gene expression in their brains,
irrespective of their drug of choice. Whether longtime drug abusers
favor cocaine, marijuana,
or PCP, their autopsied brains showed a number of common gene changes
consistent with diminished brain plasticity--i.e., the ability to learn
from new experiences and adapt to new situations. Therefore, brain functions
may be similarly impaired as the result of chronically abusing different
drugs.
Background:
Chronic drug abuse can change the structure and function of several
brain regions. Recent advances in genomic technologies allow us to monitor
the expression level of thousands of genes simultaneously in specific
parts of the
brain, including the anterior prefrontal cortex (aPFC), a region that
plays an important role in decisionmaking. A dysfunctional aPFC appears
to be a characteristic feature of the brains of drug abusers. Researchers
wanted to know if different drugs of abuse can compromise the normal
patterns of gene expression that converge in common pathways, resulting
in similar changes in the brains of drug abusers.
Study
Design: NIDA scientists compiled clinical case histories and
toxicology reports to establish the primary drug of abuse of 42 deceased
drug abusers. The drugs examined included cocaine, marijuana, and PCP.
The researchers then measured the level of expression of more than 9000
individual genes in small brain tissue samples obtained from the aPFC.
|
|
What
They Found: Although many effects were specific to each drug,
the scientists also found that nearly 80 percent of the drug abuse cases
displayed similar alterations in genetic output compared to the controls.
For example, genes involved in calcium signaling were turned down, while
genes involved in lipid- and cholesterol-related pathways were turned
up.
Comments
from the Authors: The aPFC is characterized by a particularly
dense and complex network of neural connections. Our results show that
cocaine, marijuana, and PCP can alter the function of this critical
brain area in similar ways, which could threaten the drug abuser’s
ability to make sound decisions.
What’s
Next: Many of the gene families identified here point to common
downstream pathways that should be studied further in order to understand
their specific contributions to the long-term effects of abused drugs
on the human brain.
Publication:
The study, led by Dr. Elin Lehrmann of the Cellular Neurobiology Research
Branch in NIDA’s Intramural Research Program in Baltimore, was
published in the open access journal PLoS ONE on December 27,
2006 (PLoS ONE 1:e114).
NIDA NewsScan,
August 22, 2007 |
Study
Identifies Cerebellum’s Involvement in Addiction
|
Researchers
report they have new evidence suggesting that the cerebellar vermis,
a worm-shaped structure that plays a role in concentration that was
once thought to have modest involvement in addiction, may be a key factor
in modulating the brain’s dopamine and reward systems. Dopamine is a
brain chemical that plays a significant role in drug abuse and addiction
through its effects on reward and motivation.
Dr. Carl Anderson,
of McLean Hospital and Harvard Medical School, and his colleagues took
a closer look at data from a previous study in which 10 crack cocaine
abusers viewed two videos (one of butterflies, one of people using the
drug) while undergoing brain scans. Their analysis showed that the cerebellar
vermis was particularly active when the participants watched the cocaine
video.
The researchers
also determined that the cerebellar vermis may contain dopamine transporters,
so it may be a target for cocaine and other stimulants. The dopamine
transporter is a protein that assists in the movement of dopamine from
the intercellular space back into the nerve cell. When the dopamine
transporter is blocked by drugs like cocaine, dopamine remains in the
synapse for prolonged periods and can produce intense pleasurable sensations
when it occurs in parts of the brain associated with reward. Prolonged
activation in other areas may have different outcomes, but still represents
a failure of the exquisitely regulated neuronal communication system. |
|
What it means: Scientists have not focused much attention on
the cerebellum as a brain region involved in drug-associated behaviors
due to its low concentration of dopamine and dopamine receptors, although
its importance in certain types of learning is well known. These findings
offer new insights into how brain regions may interact in addiction
The scientists
published their study in the October 12, 2005 issue of Neuropsychopharmacology.
NIDA NewsScan,
February 1, 2006 |
Rat
Study Suggests Chromatin Remodeling Affects Brain Circuits Involved in
Addiction
|
Researchers
studying the molecular machinery that underlies short-term gratification
from drug abuse and the brain changes that fuel addiction have honed
in on a key process that involves the activation of specific genes.
In rat studies,
the scientists investigated a process called chromatin remodeling, in
which histones (proteins that bind to DNA, help give chromosomes their
shape, and help control gene activity) enfolding certain genes are modified
in an effort to activate the genes. They found that the acute effects
of cocaine at this level differ from the chronic effects of the drug—acute
cocaine activated a gene called cFos (an important regulator of other
genes) while chronic administration of cocaine desensitized that gene.
Acute administration of cocaine was defined as a single injection of
the drug, while chronic cocaine was an injection given once daily for
7 days.
The researchers
also observed that chronic cocaine administration activated two other
genes, BDNF and Cdk5. Previous research has implicated the Cdk5 gene
in the rewiring of brain circuitry in a region of the brain called the
striatum, which is known to be important in cocaine’s behavioral effects.
In humans, the striatum becomes active in the presence of dopamine,
a brain chemical associated with pleasure and reward; involved in coordinating
movement, it also becomes engaged in decision-making processes. |
|
In
behavioral experiments, the scientists found that enhancing histone
modification increased the cocaine reward response. In contrast, when
the animals received drugs that reduce histone modification, they showed
diminished reward effects.
What it means: Long-term changes in chromatin remodeling might
be a crucial mechanism driving brain changes that occur in response
to drug abuse and lead to addiction. This line of research suggests
that drugs designed to short-circuit these processes hold promise as
addiction therapies.
Dr. Arvid
Kumar, Dr. Eric Nestler, and their colleagues at the University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center published their findings in the October
20, 2005 issue of Neuron.
NIDA NewsScan,
February 1, 2006 |
Scientists
Seek To Identify Patterns in Injection Drug Users
|
Researchers
from the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health
and the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Beer-Sheva, Israel, who
followed but did not treat 1,339 injection drug users for 12 years,
showed that fewer than 20 percent were able to completely cease injection
drug use.
Perhaps the
most important finding from this study is that so few injection drug
users were able to resolve their addiction. While 71 percent did experience
some period of abstinence, most took up the practice of injecting drugs
again. Only 19.6 percent succeeded in ceasing injection drug use completely
during the study.
A younger
age at enrollment, especially being younger than 30 years, was significantly
associated with cessation of drug use or with cessation followed by
relapse. Women were more likely than men to stop using injected drugs.
A total of
29 percent of the study population remained persistent drug users, the
authors report. Fourteen percent relapsed once during the study period,
and 37 percent relapsed at least twice.
The scientists
say their data show that the average time to first relapse is 10–18
months. They suggest that intervention efforts should continue throughout
this critical period to support injection drug users who try to overcome
their addiction.
Study participants
in all four groups—persistent drug users, those who ceased drug use
completely, |
|
those
who relapsed once and continued using drugs, and those who had multiple
relapses—could not be differentiated by educational level, marital status,
and the presence of dependent children, the authors report. Only a history
of incarceration differentiated people who successfully stopped using
injection drugs from those who continued to use them. However, the scientists
also report that daily use of alcohol was strongly associated with persistent
injection drug use.
Participants
who relapsed once were younger than persistent drug users. These male
participants also were 4 times more likely to report engaging in homosexual
sex.
The highest
mortality rates were seen in the persistent drug users. The principal
causes of death were overdose, violence, AIDS, and other infections.
What it means: Patterns noted in the study are consistent with
the view of drug addiction as a chronic disease, the researchers say.
The data presented emphasize the need to develop and make available
effective cessation programs for people who use injection drugs to prevent
adverse health and social outcomes.
The NIDA-funded
study by Dr. Noya Galai and colleagues was published in the October
1 issue of the American Journal of Epidemiology.
NIDA NewsScan,
December 12, 2003 |
Natural
Fat Compound May Be Basis For New Class of Drug Targeting Obesity and
Other Compulsive Disorders, Including Addiction
|
A
naturally occurring lipid called oleylethanolamide (OEA) is known to
curb appetite and regulate body weight. Although it is structurally
related to a neurotransmitter similar to marijuana’s active ingredient,
it does not bind to cannabinoid receptors. Now, NIDA-funded researchers
have found that in mice, OEA controls hunger and contributes to weight
maintenance by binding to peroxisome proliferator-activating receptors
(PPAR-alpha), which regulate several aspects of lipid metabolism.
In the study,
a team of researchers led by Dr. Daniele Piomelli at the University
of California, Irvine, fed a high-fat diet to mice that were either
normal or had their PPAR-alpha receptors genetically removed. After
the mice became obese, the researchers administered OEA for 4 weeks.
The researchers
found that the normal mice ate less and lost weight while OEA feeding
had no effect on mice that lacked PPAR-alpha receptors. They also found
that in normal mice, OEA lowered blood cholesterol levels. |
|
What it means: This study suggests that OEA plays a role in
weight maintenance and satiety by activating PPARalpha. Identifying
the receptors that contribute to the compound’s weight maintenance properties
may lead to the development of a new class of medications that target
obesity and other eating disorders. The researchers also say that because
neural mechanisms underlying reward for drugs and food can overlap,
these findings may contribute to the development of medications for
the treatment of other compulsive behaviors such as drug addiction.
This study,
funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, was published in the
September 4, 2003 issue of Nature.
NIDA NewsScan,
December 12, 2003 |
Research
Yields New Insights into Molecular Markers of Addiction
|
Building
on previous research using microarrays that identified more than 400
human genes affected by long-term cocaine abuse, researchers at the
Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center at Emory University have shown
for the first time that long-term use of cocaine induces significant
changes in gene expression in the human brain.
The scientists
compared gene and protein expression patterns in specific brain areas—the
ventral tegmental area (VTA) and the substantia nigra—in 10 cocaine
overdose victims and 11 age-matched, drug-free control subjects.
They found
significant increases in glutamate receptor subunits in the VTA of the
cocaine abusers. Glutamate is a neurotransmitter, a class of compounds
involved in regulating cell–cell communication. It is involved in neuronal
excitability and is associated with learning, memory, and synaptic plasticity.
In addition,
the scientists found significant increases in CREB (cyclic AMP responsive
element binding protein), a molecule that regulates gene expression
and is associated with addiction and memory, in the abusers’ brains.
|
|
The
scientists say this study marks the first attempt to identify molecular
neuropathological markers that may be associated with cocaine addiction.
What it means: These results show that cocaine abuse can lead
to significant alterations in the expression of specific genes in defined
brain areas associated with addictive behavior. Identifying such molecular
markers in human drug abusers broadens our understanding of the neuropathology
associated with drug abuse and may help identify new biological targets
for developing medications to treat addictive disorders.
The study,
published by Dr. Scott Hemby and colleagues and supported by the National
Institute on Drug Abuse, appeared in the May issue of the Journal
of Neurochemistry.
NIDA NewsScan,
December 12, 2003 |
College
on Problems of Drug Dependence Publishes Position Statement on Opioid
Use and Abuse
|
Nonmedical
use of prescription opioids is increasing in the United States. In a
new position statement, a task force of the College on Problems of Drug
Dependence says programs to control and reduce such abuse must be balanced
against the need for access to these drugs for legitimate medical purposes.
Opioids are
drugs that include morphine, codeine, hydrocodone (Vicodin®), and oxycodone
(Percodan®, OxyContin®), to name a few. Prescription opioids often are
prescribed to treat pain that is not alleviated by such nonopioid medications
as acetaminophen.
Results of
surveys and other data collection sources show that use of prescription
opioids appears to have risen in recent years.
Data from
the Monitoring the Future survey show that usage of prescription opioids
over a 30-day period by high school students who reported taking these
drugs without a physician telling them to do so increased by 173 percent
between 1991 and 2001. The Monitoring the Future survey is conducted
annually by the University of Michigan for the National Institute on
Drug Abuse.
The National
Household Survey on Drug Abuse tracks incidence and prevalence of drugs
of abuse in Americans aged 12 and older. Survey results showed that
the number of people using prescription opioids for nonmedical purposes
for the first time increased by 400 percent between the mid-1980s and
2000 (from 400 thousand to 2 million). Prevalence of opioid abuse was
higher in people aged 12–25 than in people aged 26 and over. The survey
also showed that the prevalence of opioid abuse is similar to that of
cocaine and heroin.
|
|
The
Drug Abuse Warning Network collects information on drug-related visits
to emergency departments. It shows that the number of ED visits related
to opioid analgesics and opioid analgesic combinations increased by
123 percent between 1994 and 2001.
The task force
emphasized that prescribed opioids are an effective means for treating
pain. It also expressed the concern that an undue focus on opioid abuse,
and the addiction that may result because of misuse of opioids, may
unwittingly lead to less use of opioids for treating pain.
Members of
the task force recommend several steps be taken to improve the ability
to make informed policy decisions on prescription opioid abuse. These
include: further epidemiological research, laboratory testing of prescription
opioids to determine abuse liability, and clinical trials to determine
the efficacy of different approaches to the prevention and treatment
of prescription opioid abuse.
What it means: Overuse and abuse of prescription opioid drugs
can have harmful ramifications for their legitimate and appropriate
use. A balanced approach is needed so programs developed to reduce and
prevent such abuse do not deter physicians from prescribing these drugs
for appropriate patients.
Dr. James
Zacny of the University of Chicago chaired the task force. The position
paper was published in the April 2003 issue of Drug and Alcohol
Dependence.
NIDA NewsScan,
July 30, 2003 |
Teen
Drug Use Linked with Later Health Problems
|
A
long-term study has linked adolescent drug use with health problems
in early adulthood. Subjects in their mid-to-late twenties who had used
drugs as teens reported more health problems than those who had never
used drugs. Health problems included: increased incidence of respiratory
conditions, such as colds and sinus infections; cognitive problems,
such as difficulty in concentrating, remembering, and learning; and
headaches, dizziness, and vision problems.
The NIDA-funded
study found also that rebelliousness, distrust of authority, and risk-taking
behavior in early adolescence and peer influences in middle adolescence
were precursors to later drug use, which, in turn, led to increased
health problems.
These findings
are from a 22-year study that tracked the self-reported substance abuse
and health histories of more than 600 youths through their early- and
mid-teen years into early adulthood. |
|
Scientists
from the Mount Sinai School of Medicine and Columbia University started
collecting data on the children in 1975, when the subjects were one
through 10 years of age. Four follow-up interviews were conducted in
1983, 1986, 1992, and 1997. By the time of the last interview, the average
subject was 27 years old.
What it means: This study adds to the body of research about
the long- term
public health consequences of drug abuse and the importance of early
intervention to
prevent adolescent drug abuse.
Lead investigator
Dr. Judith S. Brook published the study in the June 2002 issue of the
Journal of Adolescent Health.
NIDA NewsScan,
July 31, 2002 |
Study
Sheds New Light on the Age Most at Risk for Drug Use and Transition from
First Drug Use to Dependence
|
Researchers
from the Johns Hopkins University report on data from the National Comorbidity
Survey which investigated the age at which individuals are at greater
risk for starting to use marijuana, alcohol, and cocaine and when dependence
on these drugs is likely to occur. More than 8,000 individuals ages
15 to 54 answered questionsregarding the age at which they first used
these drugs, and at what age they became dependent. Of this sample,
almost half (3,940) had used marijuana; the majority (7,485) had used
alcohol; and fewer than 20 percent (1,337) had used cocaine. There were
354 cases of marijuana dependence, 220 cases of cocaine dependence,
and 212 cases of alcohol dependence.
The
survey indicated that the ages at which individuals are more at risk
for starting to use alcohol and marijuana are 17 to18 years, about 2
years earlier than for cocaine. However, once use of cocaine begins,
cocaine dependence occurs earlier and more rapidly, with more than 5
percent of cocaine users becoming dependent on the drug during thefirst
year of use. Within 10 years of their first use, more than 15 percent
of those who used cocaine were dependent, versus 8 percent of marijuana
users and approximately 12 percent of individuals who used alcohol. |
|
The
data also indicated that the risk of developing alcohol dependence extends
through middle age, whereas for marijuana and cocaine users, the period
of developing dependence generally has ended by ages 30 and 35 years,
respectively.
What it means: The periods of risk for developing dependence
on alcohol, marijuana, and cocaine are not the same. Cocaine dependence
almost always develops within the first several years after initial
use, while alcohol dependence develops more insidiously, often many
years after starting to drink. Interventions seeking to prevent ordelay
development of cocaine dependence among cocaine users should be timed
to occur soon after the start of cocaine use, since cocaine dependence
may occur within the first few years of use.
This
study was authored by Dr. Fernado Wagner and Dr. James C. Anthony, and
was published in the electronic online journal, Neuropsychopharmacology
(the official journal of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology),
and is due to appear in a hard-copy issue of Neuropsychopharmacology
early in 2002.
NIDA
NewsScan, January 30, 2002 |
|